One search committee member worried that Gaskell was “something close to a creationist.” Another said that hiring him would be a “huge public relations mistake.” A biology professor wrote to a colleague, “We might as well have the Creation Museum set up an outreach office in biology.”
Memo to future search committees: Carefully consider the idea of Creation Museum Outreach next time.
The star witness in the case, otherwise known as the chairman of the search committee, said, “If Martin were not so superbly qualified, so breathtakingly above the other applicants in background and experience, then our decision would be much simpler. We could easily choose another applicant, and we could content ourselves with the idea that Martin’s religious beliefs played little role in our decision. However, this is not the case. As it is, no objective observer could possibly believe that we excluded Martin on any basis other than religious.”
When intelligent people downgrade a candidate from “superbly qualified” to an embarrassment because he might be “potentially evangelical,” they are, by definition, practicing bigotry, regardless of how well cloaked in sophisticated language it may be.
In his 2008 documentary “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed,” Ben Stein revealed just how close-minded the university can be when it comes to protecting the institutionalized theory of evolution.
When the self-appointed arbiters of truth discard an applicant like yesterday’s lunch all because of a competing theory of origins — differences that the search committee members admitted had nothing to do with the job, then something is lost in our halls of higher learning. Places that once welcomed free and open inquiry now shut it down, and positions that were once opened to the best qualified candidates are only open to ideological clones.
What would UK have done if Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, applied for a job there? Collins directed the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium and wrote a 2006 book called “The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief.”
Collins has one of the brightest scientific minds of our day. He’s also an evangelical.
Interestingly, both Collins and Gaskell are not creationists, but apparently any talk of the possibility of God so threatens the exclusive platform of their peers that excommunication from the Church of Darwinian Fundamentalism is in order.
It seems the UK debacle is really a chess match of ideology, and Gaskell merely a pawn. It was his non-conforming ideas that threatened the status quo — ideas that UK gatekeepers will be keen to censure in the future.
But when a university violates someone’s civil rights, as UK is charged with, they are in danger of becoming an institution plagued by what one of its own faculty members called a “McCarthyism of the Left.”
Richard Nelson of Trigg County is a policy analyst for The Family Foundation.
