Advertisement

Jessamine County facing child support funding issues

August 11, 2011|By Laura Butler | lbutler@jessaminejournal.com
  • Source: Jessamine County attorney's office
Graphic created by Ben Kleppinger

Jessamine County comes in as the 18th-largest county in the state of Kentucky when comparing populations of the 120 counties. But when it comes to calculating how much funding Jessamine County gets for child support from the state government, 30 counties are receiving more money than Jessamine, county attorney Brian Goettl said.

Goettl made a report to the Jessamine County Fiscal Court at its Aug. 2 meeting and informed the magistrates and Judge-Executive Neal Cassity that he has some serious concerns about the amount of funding Jessamine County is getting from the state for its child-support services. Jessamine County is the lowest funded county in the state on a per-capita basis, he said. Jessamine County receives $278,500 from the state to cover a county with 47,589 people in it, which means the county receives about $5.85 per capita. The average is about $10 per capita.

And that funding level has remained the same for the county for the past three years, Goettl said. Last year, the fiscal court had to pick up about $18,000 in child support as the county was running a deficit in the child-support office.

Advertisement

“It’s getting harder and harder to fund child support at the rate the state gives us, especially when you look at what other counties get,” Goettl told the fiscal court.

In comparison to other counties its size, Jessamine is at a significant disadvantage.

For instance, Hopkins County has a population of 46,167, about 1,422 fewer people than Jessamine County, and it receives $524,891 in child support funding from the state, Goettl said in an interview Tuesday.

The difference in service is significant. Hopkins County has nine people working in its child-support office, whereas Jessamine County has four people.

Those four people have to cover about 4,000 active cases in Jessamine County, Goettl said.

“The case load for our four is exceptionally high ... it puts an enormous burden on the staff,” he said. “They’re trying to keep up with counties that have a lot more money and a lot more people doing the same thing.”

One of the main problems with the funding system is the imbalance from federal funding down to funding to counties within the state, Goettl said.

Federal funding is increasing, but Goettl said he’s not seeing that come through the state’s distribution to the counties.

“Federal spending has increased by 33 percent, but it hasn’t increased on the state level at all,” Goettl told the fiscal court last week, explaining that he thinks the money from the federal government is being spent on other expenses by the state.

Goettl said there’s not much that the county can do for now to get increased funding, but it’s something he’s working to bring to people’s attention.

“There’s not much negotiating we can do since the state has not increased funding in three years. It’s apparent we’re severely underfunded though. If we were funded at the average (for counties in Kentucky), we would receive $453,000, not $278,500.

“There’s not going to be any increase in funding this year, but you have to be prepared for next year.”
State leaders should take a serious look at why federal funds come into the state for child support yet no increase for child support enforcement comes to the counties from the state, Goettl said.

“We’ve got to ask the state to step up to the plate and stop cutting funding for custodial parents who need support for their children,” he said.

Central Kentucky News Articles
|
|
|