NEWS
Doug Kendall | October 5, 2007
Media coverage of the Supreme Court tends to be dominated by the scoreboard, with stories chronicling the number of closely divided cases won by the "liberal" and "conservative" wings of the Court. But as we start chalking up wins and losses for the October 2007 term, we should pause: too much staring at the scoreboard can obscure what's really happening on the field (or bench). Conservative "wins" mean something very different now, because the conservative judicial project has changed dramatically.
OPINION
October 22, 2006
Dear Editor, I would like to strongly encourage everyone in Danville to vote for my good friend Mary Noble. Judge Mary Noble was a high school teacher and a college professor before she went to law school. In the last 15 years, she has presided over more than 14,000 cases, showing respect for everyone in her courtroom. Judge Noble has the experience, integrity and wisdom to serve on the Supreme Court with honor. Please join me in voting for Mary Noble, whose name fits her character.
NEWS
BRENDA S. EDWARDS | January 11, 2006
LIBERTY - Casey Circuit Judge James G. Weddle will remain on the bench to hear the Bendschneider child custody case. The state Supreme Court ruled Friday that Weddle "failed to demonstrate any disqualifying circumstance which would require the appointment of a special judge," according to an order signed by Chief Justice Joseph Lambert. The request for a special judge was denied. Arletta D. Bendschneider, who is seeking custody of her two children, asked for Weddle's recusal in December.
OPINION
DAVID TAPP | June 22, 2006
Two recent decisions reflect a sharply divided Supreme Court. Such decisions provide little or no guidance to litigants and provoke doubt regarding the legitimacy and expected duration of the current law. Several weeks ago, the Court heard arguments in a case involving the federal Clean Water Act ("CWA"). Implementation of the Act has led to regulation of private lands with little or no connection to any navigable waterway. As a result of the Act, developers must deal with increasing bureaucracy when contemplating nearly any building project.
OPINION
Thomas A. Bowden | October 6, 2005
Since 1994 Oregon physicians have been permitted by statute to help their patients commit suicide. The federal government's challenge to that law will be argued on Wednesday before the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, the court is likely to base its eventual decision on legal technicalities rather than on the real issue: an individual's unconditional right to commit suicide. The Oregon law that is under attack permits a doctor to prescribe a lethal dose of drugs to a mentally competent, terminally ill patient who makes written and oral requests, consults two physicians, and endures a mandatory waiting period.
OPINION
July 2, 2008
Dear Editor, Why does Supreme Court vote on something already on books? What is this country coming to when people made this country's highest court vote on an item that has already been addressed over 200 years ago? The item of business: the right to bear arms. This was brought up to our federal officials over two centuries ago, and they, the officials, wrote up what is sometimes referred to as the Bill of Rights. In this proclamation is the right to bear arms in order to protect ourselves.
OPINION
October 27, 2004
Dear Editor: This election is probably one of the most important we've ever had. Why? Because the next president will be appointing two to four Supreme Court justices. According to Senator Kerry, the new appointees must pass a litmus test. They cannot overturn Roe vs. Wade. They will even be allowed to legislate from the bench. "Changing times require changing thoughts/beliefs," Kerry has said. Our founding fathers wanted three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.
OPINION
October 31, 2006
Dear Editor, If you are looking for a good conservative candidate for Supreme Court justice, please consider keeping Justice Roach. Rarely do we have the opportunity to vote for a candidate who has such good conservative moral values that all of us who claim to be Christians admire. During the 10 years that I have known John, I have observed the success he has enjoyed mostly practicing civil law. In my view as a layman, this field of law requires the very best and brightest in the profession.
BUSINESS
February 14, 2008
The Kentucky Supreme Court has overturned a Court of Appeals decision in the case of Papa John's, International, Inc. v. McCoy, upholding arguments made by the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce in an amicus brief filed on behalf of Kentucky businesses. Central to the case was whether a franchisor can be held liable for the actions of a franchisee's employee over whom it has no control of hiring or managing. The Court of Appeals took what the Supreme Court called a "mixed bag" of legal theories in finding that a franchisor could be liable, but in its decision overturning the Court of Appeals ruling, the Supreme Court recognized that it had to "take a more precise approach given the ubiquity of the franchise method of doing business in Kentucky.
NEWS
Liz O'Donnell | May 12, 2009
As the search for a Supreme Court justice to replace David Souter heats up, political pundits and analysts are talking about what litmus test, if any, President Obama might apply when vetting a nominee. But scientific metaphors are not needed in this situation - basic math skills are. An early childhood mathematics concept called one-to-one correspondence shows us that President Obama needs to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court. Currently, 51 percent of the country's population is female.